Chris Huff wrote:
> 
[...]
> 
> *Lots* of ram...since a 3df file is simply 256-bit grayscale, you would
> need separate 3df files to specify those other variables. And to get a
> large landscape, you would need a fairly high-res landscape file(the
> others, like erodability maps, could be much lower resolution).
> A 256*64*256 file would equal 4MB...3df doesn't have any compression.
> And 512*128*512 would be 32MB. Good thing interpolation is available. :-)
> 

All that is not really effective, because you have to carry the whole "air"
around that is never used.  

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message